Monday Laugh or Monday Scare ?

I can’t decide if this is some kind of joke or if we should start to worry: 

Of last year’s 10 best-selling novels [in Japan], five were originally cellphone novels, mostly love stories written in the short sentences characteristic of text messaging but containing little of the plotting or character development found in traditional novels. 

Should we scoff at new literary expressions as being too basic in plot, characters and language to even qualify as novels, or in the contrary encourage them as a way for people otherwise uninterested in books to access literature? Young Japanese seem to find traditional novels boring and unrelated to their lives and their concerns. I can understand this generational problem, but I nonetheless find it sad. Nowhere in the article is it mentioned that new readers, after discovering literature through so-called “cellphone novels”, move on to more traditional literature. 

“It’s not that they had a desire to write and that the cellphone happened to be there,” said Chiaki Ishihara, an expert in Japanese literature at Waseda University who has studied cellphone novels. “Instead, in the course of exchanging e-mail, this tool called the cellphone instilled in them a desire to write.” Indeed, many cellphone novelists had never written fiction before, and many of their readers had never read novels before, according to publishers. 

I can’t just condemn these young novelists for trying to squeeze writing in their busy schedule: after all, I too try and write during my daily commute. What is the fundamental difference between them and “traditional” writers of mass-market fiction, romances, chicklit etc.? What disturbs me most is their disinterest in language itself.

Advertisements

One thought on “Monday Laugh or Monday Scare ?

  1. hmmm, hadn’t heard of this before. I’d actually love to take a look at one and see if they are meant to be funny, if they use dialogue in a way that tells a story or just how they function. I share your concern for these types of new literature and their lack of interest in preserving language…what does that mean and should we be really worried?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s